Previous Page  10 / 54 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 10 / 54 Next Page
Page Background

10

also as the exchange rate is an important channel of

monetary policy transmission. In a globalised world, the

foreign exchange market is one of the most vital parts of

the financial plumbing.

One of the guiding principles that has underpinned our

work in developing the Code is that the Code should

promote a robust, fair, liquid, open and transparent

market. A diverse set of buyers and sellers, supported

by resilient infrastructure, should be able to confidently

and effectively transact at competitive prices that reflect

available market information and in a manner that

conforms to acceptable standards of behaviour. Note

that I am talking about all sections of the FX market:

buyers, sellers and infrastructure.

The work to develop the Code began two years ago,

in May 2015, when the BIS Governors commissioned

a working group of the Markets Committee of the BIS

(which I chaired until early January this year) to do two

things: first, establish a single global code of conduct for

the wholesale FX market and second, to come up with

mechanisms to promote greater adherence to the Code.

2

This work was very much a public sector–private sector

partnership. We were ably and vigorously supported by

a group of market participants, chaired by David Puth,

CEO of CLS. David’s group contained people from all

around the world on the buy side, including corporates

and asset managers, and the sell side, along with trading

platforms, ECNs and non-bank participants, drawing

from the various Foreign Exchange Committees (FXCs)

and beyond. All parts of the market were involved in the

drafting of the Code to make sure all perspectives were

heard and appropriately reflected.

There are two important points worth highlighting: first,

it’s a single code for the whole industry and second, it’s

a global code.

On the first point, the Code supplants the existing codes

that have been present in the FX market. So there is

now one single code. Importantly, the Code covers all of

the wholesale FX industry. This is not a code for just the

sell side. It is there for the sell side, the buy side, non-

bank participants and the platforms; it reaches around

the globe and across the whole industry. The way it is

relevant will depend on the nature of the engagement

with the FX market. What this means in practice is that

the steps different market participants take to align

their activities with the principles of the Code will differ,

reflecting the size, complexity, type and extent of their

engagement with the FX market.

2 See

<www.bis.org/press/p150511.htm>

On the second point, it’s a global code: our group

contained representatives from the central bank and

private sector fromall the 16 largest FX centres, including

both developed and emerging markets.

The first phase of the Code was released in May 2016.

It covered areas such as ethics, information sharing,

aspects of execution and confirmation and settlement.

The second phase covered further aspects of execution

including e-trading and platforms, prime brokerage,

as well as governance, and risk management and

compliance.

The complete Code comprises 55 principles spanning

these issues. The principles are written in plain language

and should be easily read and understood by market

participants. The principles are supplemented by a suite

of examples to illustrate their practical application.

Market participants had a number of opportunities to

comment on the Code, in addition to the direct input of

the Market Participants Group. Before its release, drafts

of the full text of the Code were distributed to market

participants for their review, principally through the

various FXCs, but also through other industry associations

to ensure all perspectives were appropriately reflected in

the Code. Through this process, over 10,000 comments

were received.

The Code reflects our collective judgement as to what

constitutes good practice in the market, taking account

of the feedback received. I think it is a good outcome

of the process that we were able to distil the points of

contention down to a small number of issues. Outside of

these, the feedback reflected a widely held consensus

as to what is good practice. The degree of consensus

and the willingness to contribute to the process reflect

the fact that market participants have recognised the

Code’s aim of helping move the FX market to a better

place.

One of our central aims in drafting the Code is for it to

be principles-based rather than rules- based. There

are a number of reasons why this is so but, for me, an

important reason is that the more prescriptive the

Code is, the easier it is to get around. Rules are easier

to arbitrage than principles. The more prescriptive and

the more precise the code, the less people will think

about what they are doing. If it’s principles-based and

less prescriptive then market participants will have to

think about whether their actions are consistent with the

principles of the Code.

But we have not written a procedures manual. Rather,

we have articulated principles that need to be taken into

account. Individual firms may then take these principles