Previous Page  22 / 50 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 22 / 50 Next Page
Page Background

International Working Committees

OVERVIEW ON THE BEPS FINAL PACKAGE

By PIERGIORGIO VALENTE, Chairman IAFEI International Tax Working Committee

Some are of the view that we are witnessing a paradigm

shift, others maintain that we are merely on the

threshold of much more complex times embedded with

an increased compliance burden.

With the release, on October 5, of the long-awaited

final Reports on the OECD BEPS (Base Erosion and

Profit Shifting) project, we are now about to enter the

“implementation phase”.

The BEPS final Package includes:

a. Minimum standards

b. Revision of existing OECD Standards

c. Common approaches and best practices

guidance

d. Detailed report on measuring BEPS.

Minimum standards were agreed in areas in which

no action by some countries would have created

negative spill-overs (including negative impacts on

competitiveness) on other countries, respectively on

Actions 5 (Harmful Tax Practices), Action 6 (Treaty

Abuse), Action 13 (Transfer Pricing Documentation and

Country by Country Reporting) and Action 14 (Dispute

Resolution Mechanisms).

On Action 5, there was consensus on an agreed

methodology to assess whether there is substantial

activity in a given preferential regime. The nexus

approach for preferential intellectual property (IP)

regimes demands an alignment of the benefits of

such regimes along with substantive research and

development activity; in addition, countries committed

to transparency through the mandatory spontaneous

exchange of relevant information on specific rulings.

As far as Treaty Abuse is concerned (Action 6), the

minimum standards includemodel provisions developed

to prevent treaty abuse to be included in the multilateral

instrument available to countries for implementation of

the agreed provisions on tax treaty issues into bilateral

tax treaties. Taking into account that some of these

provisions call for additional technical work, further

developments are expected in years to come.

Minimum standards were also agreed on Action 13

(Transfer Pricing Documentation and Country by

Country Reporting). MNEs with an annual consolidated

group revenue equal or above EUR 750 million will need

to report: revenues, pre-tax profits, income tax paid and

accrued, number of employees, stated capital, retained

earnings, and tangible assets in each jurisdiction where

they operate.

CbCR should be filed in the ultimate parent company’s

jurisdiction and exchanged automatically through

government-to-government information exchange

procedures. In addition, it was acknowledged that the

CbCR should be disclosed only to Tax Administrations

and under specific conditions (ensuring confidentiality,

and the proper use of information).

Finally, in the dispute resolution area (Action 14),

agreement on a minimum standard to ensure progress

on dispute resolution was reached. A large group of

countries expressed their commitment to move quickly

towards mandatory and binding arbitration.

The Minimum Standards were supplemented with

OECD Standards and Recommendations: by revisiting

existing standards (e.g., transfer pricing); by suggesting a

common approach that will facilitate the convergence of

national practices in other areas (e.g., hybrid mismatch

arrangements, interest deductibility) and also best

practice guidance (e.g., CFC, mandatory disclosure).

Please find here below a brief overview (based on OECD

Reports) of the main developments in each action:

As the OECD BEPS Explanatory Statement released in

October 2015 outlines, “Countries are sovereign. It is

therefore up to them to implement these changes, and

measures may be implemented in different manners,

22